The Fight to Remove the Cornell Seven Prosecutor
Notas del episodio
📓 Get your Plaud Device with an exclusive 10% off by using code LEGALEAGLE https://legaleagle.link/plaud10 Discount code also works on Amazon if you use my link: https://legaleagle.link/plaud10AMZ
This episode is sponsored by Plaud.
Who gets to investigate the Cornell Seven? New York Attorney General Letitia James has taken over the criminal investigation, and two of the men accused in Jane Doe's civil lawsuit are asking courts to remove her.
Anna Bower explains how Governor Kathy Hochul replaced the local district attorney, why the two challenges take different routes through the courts, and the high bar for disqualifying a prosecutor. At the center of both challenges is a social media post that the men say shows James had already made up her mind.
The episode also examines the charging deadlines and the connection between the criminal investigation and Jane Doe's civil lawsuit. The men deny wrongdoing. The allegations and procedural developments are discussed as they stood at the time of recording.
Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam
CHAPTERS
(00:00) The Cornell Seven investigation
(01:15) Plaud sponsor
(02:37) The allegations and the original investigation
(05:40) How the governor can replace a prosecutor
(08:48) The first challenge to Letitia James
(11:40) Why removing a prosecutor is difficult
(15:29) Winston Lee's challenge and the grand jury
(19:56) What happens next in the two cases
(20:29) The possible deadline for criminal charges
(22:46) Gag-order and venue requests
(23:36) The civil lawsuit's filing deadlines
(27:13) How criminal charges could revive civil claims
(28:16) EagleTeam: finding the right lawyer
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).