Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?
Notes de l’épisode
Fifty years after the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment, the death penalty remains one of America's most divisive issues. Supporters argue it delivers justice for the most heinous crimes, provides closure for victims’ families, and ensures the worst offenders can never kill again. Opponents point to wrongful convictions, racial disparities, and the moral consequences of allowing the state to take a life, arguing that life without parole is enough. Now we debate: Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished? This ethical conundrum is at the crux of this week's debate, originally broadcast in April 2015.
Arguing YES:
Diann Rust-Tierney, Executive Director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty
Barry Scheck, Co-Director of the Innocence Project and Professor at Cardozo Law School
Arguing NO:
Robert Blecker, Professor at New York Law School
Kent Scheidegger, Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Join the conversation on Substack—share your perspective on this episode and subscribe to our weekly newsletter for curated insights from our debaters, moderators, and staff.
Follow us on YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and TikTok to stay connected with our mission and ongoing debates.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices