The Case That Was Built Backwards
Notes de l’épisode
Most trial teams build a case by following the litigation timeline. The strongest teams build it by starting with the verdict they need to achieve and working backward. In this episode, we explore why reverse-engineering your case can uncover hidden weaknesses, sharpen discovery, strengthen mediation, and create a more persuasive trial strategy. The key takeaway: don't let procedure dictate your strategy. Build every stage of your case with the end in mind.
In This Episode
- Why chronological case preparation creates strategic blind spots
- How reverse-engineering strengthens discovery, depositions, and motion practice
- The difference between legal proof and jury proof
- Why jurors respond to human meaning, not just technical evidence
- How early pressure testing reveals narrative gaps and credibility risks
- Why mediation is often won or lost long before the session begins
- How behavioral science helps plaintiff teams refine strategy from intake through trial
https://scienceofjustice.com/
@JuryAnalyst