Ethical Machines
- Folgen
- 106
- Erscheint
- wöchentlich
- Letzte Folge
- 12. Nov. 2026
Über den Podcast
I have to roll my eyes at the constant click bait headlines on technology and ethics.
If we want to get anything done, we need to go deeper.
That’s where I come in. I’m Reid Blackman, a former philosophy professor turned AI ethics advisor to government and business.
If you’re looking for a podcast that has no tolerance for the superficial, try out Ethical Machines.
Folgen 106
Is AI Risk Really New?
We tend to talk about AI risk as something brand new. Shana Morgan, Global Head of AI/Privacy at L3Harris Technologies, says the risks are old ones we never addressed, like bias, privacy, security and mental …
Shownotes
We tend to talk about AI risk as something brand new. Shana Morgan, Global Head of AI/Privacy at L3Harris Technologies, says the risks are old ones we never addressed, like bias, privacy, security and mental health, and AI amplifies them at scale. Treating them as new, she argues, gives organizations an out on accountability. We talk about why policy shouldn’t lead AI governance, why privacy, legal, IP and security teams need to stop working in silos, how working on AI differs from working on privacy, and why employees need basic AI education explained simply enough for your grandmother.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsWe Should Protect AI Speech
We tend to assume AI can’t have free speech rights, since there’s no one there to speak. Jeffrey Howard, author of Setting Fire to Reason and a political philosopher at University College London, argues that …
Shownotes
We tend to assume AI can’t have free speech rights, since there’s no one there to speak. Jeffrey Howard, author of Setting Fire to Reason and a political philosopher at University College London, argues that government restrictions on AI outputs based on content or viewpoint are still a free speech violation, because the people who would read or watch that content are the ones wronged. We talk about why banning an AI-generated video wrongs its audience the way banning Das Kapital wrongs its readers rather than Marx, whether words with no speaker behind them count as speech at all, whether AI companies have free speech rights of their own, and why he thinks platforms should label AI content rather than ban it.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsHow Far Does a Data Scientist’s Responsibility Go?
How far does a data scientist’s responsibility reach? Does it stop at building an accurate model, or does it extend to what the model does once it’s in use? Ben Green, professor at the University of Michigan …
Shownotes
How far does a data scientist’s responsibility reach? Does it stop at building an accurate model, or does it extend to what the model does once it’s in use? Ben Green, professor at the University of Michigan, former data scientist for the City of Boston, and author of Algorithmic Realism: Data Science Practices to Promote Social Justice, thinks it extends a long way: being a good data scientist means thinking about overall impact. I press him on whether being good at data science and being an ethically good data scientist are the same thing, whether data scientists are in a position to see how their work will play out, what to do when they disagree about what a good outcome is, and how much we should ask of individual data scientists versus their field and the systems they work in.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsRewriting History with AI
What happens when students turn to LLMs to learn about history? My guest, Nuno Moniz, Associate Research Professor at the University of Notre Dame, argues this can ultimately lead to mass confusion, which in …
Shownotes
What happens when students turn to LLMs to learn about history? My guest, Nuno Moniz, Associate Research Professor at the University of Notre Dame, argues this can ultimately lead to mass confusion, which in turn can lead to tragic conflicts. There are at least three sources of that confusion: AI hallucinations, misinformation spreading, and biased interpretations of history getting the upper hand. Exactly how bad this can get and what we’re supposed to do about it isn’t obvious, but Nuno has some suggestions.. Previously aired in season three.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsAI Won’t Speak for My Father
Today I’m talking with Elisha Wiesel, chair of the Elie Wiesel Foundation and former CIO of Goldman Sachs. We talk about why the foundation won’t use AI to recreate his father (Nobel Prizer winner and author of …
Shownotes
Today I’m talking with Elisha Wiesel, chair of the Elie Wiesel Foundation and former CIO of Goldman Sachs. We talk about why the foundation won’t use AI to recreate his father (Nobel Prizer winner and author of "Night," which recounts his experience in Auschwitz), why he refuses to say what his father would have thought about today’s politics, whether LLMs should show where their ideas come from and whether anyone would care if they did, what the Talmud can teach us about preserving minority opinions and saying “I don’t know,” and what financial models and LLMs get wrong in the same ways.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsSeriously? AI Welfare?
I roll my eyes at talk of "AI welfare," the idea that we should take seriously the notion that AI has interests or a well-being that we should take seriously. My guests, Geoff Keeling and Winnie Street, both …
Shownotes
I roll my eyes at talk of "AI welfare," the idea that we should take seriously the notion that AI has interests or a well-being that we should take seriously. My guests, Geoff Keeling and Winnie Street, both Fellows at the Institute of Philosophy at University of London and co-authors of “Emerging Questions in AI Welfare," don't think that anything like today's AI models are conscious or have a welfare we need to concern ourselves with. But they do want to take seriously questions about whether they could ever have a welfare, what that would take, how morally costly it would be if we failed to attribute well-being to entities that have one and how costly it would be if we attribute well-being to entities that have none. Buckle up - it's a complex and fascinating discussion.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsThe Good and Bad of AI Companions
We often think of AI companions as bad, or at least suspect. Giada Pistilli, formerly Principal Ethicist at Hugging Face and now at Mistral, wants to test that assumption, and she's done a lot of research to …
Shownotes
We often think of AI companions as bad, or at least suspect. Giada Pistilli, formerly Principal Ethicist at Hugging Face and now at Mistral, wants to test that assumption, and she's done a lot of research to back up her view. In her new book, The Essential Guide to AI Companions, she looks at people who form emotional relationships with chatbots as partners, as therapists, and as stand-ins for parents who have died. We talk about how people end up in these relationships, why most of them weren't looking for one, whether attachment to a chatbot is a problem in itself, and whether chatbot memory should be off by default.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsThe Honesty Crisis
My guest today is Christian B. Miller, professor of philosophy and author of The Honesty Crisis. Christian's central claim is that technology (AI, social media, etc.) has created conditions where dishonesty is …
Shownotes
My guest today is Christian B. Miller, professor of philosophy and author of The Honesty Crisis. Christian's central claim is that technology (AI, social media, etc.) has created conditions where dishonesty is increasingly incentivized and easier to get away with. When you put those two together, you get an honesty crisis.
We discuss, as some examples of growing dishonesty, students using LLMs to write papers and passing off the work as their own, romantic relationships with AI and whether having one could constitute cheating, celebrity and influencer culture's relationship to bullshit and self-deception, and the surprising problem of pastors plagiarizing sermons with AI. While the conversation was about an alleged and plausible crisis, it turned out to be a very fun one.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsHow Should We Work with AI Agents?
Season four kicks off with Paula Goldman, author of the new book, “Manage the Machine: How to Harness Human AI Collaboration at Work,” Paula is also Salesforce’s Chief Ethical and Humane Use Officer. We talk …
Shownotes
Season four kicks off with Paula Goldman, author of the new book, “Manage the Machine: How to Harness Human AI Collaboration at Work,” Paula is also Salesforce’s Chief Ethical and Humane Use Officer. We talk about the expertise pipeline problem, why humans should be "at the help" instead of "in the loop," and the ways responsibility gets murky when dealing with teams comprised of people and AI agents.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsSeason Finale: AI Paradoxes
Here are three paradoxes, according to Virginia Dignum, my guest today: 1. The more capable AI becomes, the more it reveals the richness and complexity of human intelligence. 2. Less bias in AI does not …
Shownotes
Here are three paradoxes, according to Virginia Dignum, my guest today: 1. The more capable AI becomes, the more it reveals the richness and complexity of human intelligence. 2. Less bias in AI does not necessarily create more justice. 3. The pursuit of artificial superintelligence may ultimately reveal that humanity's greatest intelligence is collective, not artificial.
We discuss the limits of computation, the dangers of confusing data with reality, why AI ethics often misses deeper social problems, and what it would mean to build technology that genuinely serves human flourishing rather than replacing it. Our conversation is grounded in the book “The AI Paradox”, authored by Virginia, who is a professor in Responsible Artificial Intelligence and the Director of the AI Policy Lab at Umeå University in Sweden.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsLLMs are the Wrong Kind of AI
Jonathan Schaeffer thinks we're building AI the wrong way.While large language models have produced remarkable results, he argues that hallucinations, bias, and unreliability aren't bugs that can be …
Shownotes
Jonathan Schaeffer thinks we're building AI the wrong way.
While large language models have produced remarkable results, he argues that hallucinations, bias, and unreliability aren't bugs that can be fixed—they're consequences of the underlying architecture itself. In his view, LLMs are an important stepping stone, but not the path to the kind of AI we can truly trust.
We discuss whether current AI systems are "good enough," automation bias, AI regulation, data centers, environmental costs, and the race toward AGI. We also debate whether society should slow down long enough to put meaningful guardrails in place before deploying increasingly powerful AI systems at scale.
Jonathan Schaeffer is a Professor of Computing Science at the University of Alberta and a pioneer in artificial intelligence research.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsAI is Social Infrastructure
My guest, Mona Sloane, author of Predicted: How AI Is Restructuring Social Life, argues that AI has become part of our social infrastructure. Its predictive systems increasingly shape how we work, find …
Shownotes
My guest, Mona Sloane, author of Predicted: How AI Is Restructuring Social Life, argues that AI has become part of our social infrastructure. Its predictive systems increasingly shape how we work, find information, build relationships, and navigate society.
Mona worries that as prediction becomes embedded in more areas of life, we risk becoming less willing to deliberate, challenge assumptions, and shape our own futures. I push back on whether AI really should be understood as infrastructure and whether predictions made by AI are fundamentally different from the predictions humans have always made.
We also discuss democracy, power, regulation, and what happens when prediction becomes the dominant way of understanding the world.
Book: https://a.co/d/04GwwuFR
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsHow AI Threatens Scientific Inquiry
Science depends on more than just results. It depends on researchers asking questions, testing hypotheses, challenging assumptions, and scrutinizing evidence.My guest, Emily Sullivan, Senior Lecturer in …
Shownotes
Science depends on more than just results. It depends on researchers asking questions, testing hypotheses, challenging assumptions, and scrutinizing evidence.
My guest, Emily Sullivan, Senior Lecturer in Philosophy of Science and AI at the University of Edinburgh, argues that AI is beginning to influence every stage of the scientific process—from deciding which questions get asked to how papers are written, reviewed, and published.
We discuss algorithmic monocultures, scientific de-skilling, AI-generated research, and whether the pressure to accelerate discovery risks undermining the very process that makes science reliable in the first place.
I'm sympathetic to the promise of AI in science. Emily is concerned that, if we're not careful, we may end up optimizing for scientific output at the expense of scientific inquiry itself.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsWho is Responsible for AI Agents?
My guest, Fabio Tollon, a postdoctoral researcher on the BRAID programme at the University of Edinburgh, argues that answering that question is more difficult than it first appears. Traditional theories of …
Shownotes
My guest, Fabio Tollon, a postdoctoral researcher on the BRAID programme at the University of Edinburgh, argues that answering that question is more difficult than it first appears. Traditional theories of moral responsibility suggest that people should only be blamed for actions they understand and control. But AI systems seem to challenge both requirements.
We discuss responsibility gaps, the problem of many hands, whether AI developers are more like parents or engineers, and Fabio's distinction between moral responsibility and moral answerability. Along the way, we explore whether answerability can help us make sense of AI harms when blame is difficult to assign.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsCreating AIs with a Normative Capacity
Aligning an AI traditionally looks like a matter of giving it rules to obey. But my guest, Gillian Hadfield, Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, thinks that’s the wrong …
Shownotes
Aligning an AI traditionally looks like a matter of giving it rules to obey. But my guest, Gillian Hadfield, Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, thinks that’s the wrong approach. She argues that we need to think about what it means to have a normative capacity - an ability to categorize behavior as (un)acceptable in a given context by observing that context - and then think about what it would mean to give that capacity to an AI. Lots to dig into here, including especially our disagreement about whether she’s focused on an ethical normative capacity vs. a prudential normative capacity.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsExistentialist Risk
Technologist’s are racing to create AGI, artificial general intelligence. They also say we must align the AGI’s moral values with our own. But Professors Ariela Tubert and Justin Tiehen argue that’s impossible …
Shownotes
Technologist’s are racing to create AGI, artificial general intelligence. They also say we must align the AGI’s moral values with our own. But Professors Ariela Tubert and Justin Tiehen argue that’s impossible. Once you create an AGI, they say, you also give them the intellectual capacity needed for freedom, including the freedom to reject your given values. Originally aired in season 2.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsAI Governance is Lagging
The Thomson Reuters Foundation recently conducted a global survey and found that most companies are lagging in their attempts to govern AI. For me the most surprising stat is that 85% of companies don’t have …
Shownotes
The Thomson Reuters Foundation recently conducted a global survey and found that most companies are lagging in their attempts to govern AI. For me the most surprising stat is that 85% of companies don’t have any training on AI risks for their employees. I think that’s just insane. Today my guests are Antonio Zappulla, CEO of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, and Katie Fowler, Director of Responsible Business. We talk about how they conducted their research, their results, and what incentives there are for businesses to do better.
To get in touch with Thomson Reuters Foundation to participate in their next survey, please go to: https://www.trust.org/newsletter/
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPredictions are Commands
My guest, Carissa Véliz, is author of the new book “Prophecy: Prediction, Power, and the Fight for the Future, from Ancient Oracles to AI.” Her thesis is that when leaders in AI say things like “AI adoption is …
Shownotes
My guest, Carissa Véliz, is author of the new book “Prophecy: Prediction, Power, and the Fight for the Future, from Ancient Oracles to AI.” Her thesis is that when leaders in AI say things like “AI adoption is inevitable,” they’re not making a prediction, but rather giving us a command and attempting to legitimize their power. Is she right? Have a listen!
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsThe Ethical Nightmare Challenge: Chapters 6-7 and Conclusion
Chapter Six: Dream Teams for Ethical NightmaresThree Types of ENC TeamsENC Teams as Emergency ResponseTools for TeamsENC Teams in BloomChapter Seven: ENC: An Approach So Flexible It Makes SimoneBiles Look Like …
Shownotes
Chapter Six: Dream Teams for Ethical Nightmares
- Three Types of ENC Teams
- ENC Teams as Emergency Response
- Tools for Teams
- ENC Teams in Bloom
Chapter Seven: ENC: An Approach So Flexible It Makes Simone
- Biles Look Like C-3PO
- Hands Off!
- You Do You
- Marrying ENC to Existing Practices
- Folding Existing Resources into ENC Teams
- Folding ENC Teams into Existing Resources
- The Ethical Nightmare Challenge for... Everyone
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsThe Ethical Nightmare Challenge: Chapters 4-5
Chapter 4: The Standard Approach to Responsible AI Is Crumbling The Standard ApproachThe Madness in the MethodTurn That Smile Upside DownCats and Tigers, Oh My!Chapter 5: Why I Like Nightmares and You Should …
Shownotes
Chapter 4: The Standard Approach to Responsible AI Is Crumbling
- The Standard Approach
- The Madness in the Method
- Turn That Smile Upside Down
- Cats and Tigers, Oh My!
Chapter 5: Why I Like Nightmares and You Should, Too
- The Power of Nightmares
- What Good Nightmares Look Like
- And Now the Moment You've Been Waiting For
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsThe Ethical Nightmare Challenge: Chapters 2-3
Chapter Two: Things Get Complicated with Generative AISo Now We’re Going to Lose My Grandmother, AgainThe Creators’ Version of a Rough DraftThe Creators Align (Kind of)BigBusinessAIThe Master PrompterThe …
Shownotes
Chapter Two: Things Get Complicated with Generative AI
- So Now We’re Going to Lose My Grandmother, Again
- The Creators’ Version of a Rough Draft
- The Creators Align (Kind of)
- BigBusinessAI
- The Master Prompter
- The Changing AI Risk Landscape
Chapter Three: Humans Had a Good Run, but Now I Bring You... AI Agents!
- How to Build an AI Agent
- AI Agent Ecosystems
- Agentic Sources of Ethical Nightmares
- The Classic “But Humans Make Errors, Too!” Objection
- The Ground Exploded Beneath Our Feet
- After the Earthquake
Interlude: Get a Grip, Man!
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsThe Ethical Nightmare Challenge
My new book released just two days. It’s about how insanely complex the AI risk landscape has become, why the standard approach to Responsible AI is broken, and develops a novel approach to avoiding the worst …
Shownotes
My new book released just two days. It’s about how insanely complex the AI risk landscape has become, why the standard approach to Responsible AI is broken, and develops a novel approach to avoiding the worst of AI. In this episode I offer you the Introduction and Chapter 1 of the audiobook. If you don’t laugh at least once, I consider the book a failure.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsCreating Universal Standards for AI Risk
ISO 42001 sounds serious. It's got a serious (and boring) name, it's backed by 60+ countries, and some companies seek ISO 42001 certification. But is the standard any good? Does it actually prevent harms? Can …
Shownotes
ISO 42001 sounds serious. It's got a serious (and boring) name, it's backed by 60+ countries, and some companies seek ISO 42001 certification. But is the standard any good? Does it actually prevent harms? Can we have generic standards? And how can the standards be flexible enough to account for the fast paced change in the AI world? I’m a bit of a skeptic about all this, but my guest, Patrick Sullivan, VP of Strategy and Innovation at A-lign, is a true believer. And he makes a strong case. You decide if my skepticism is unwarranted.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsExistentialist Risk
Technologist’s are racing to create AGI, artificial general intelligence. They also say we must align the AGI’s moral values with our own. But Professors Ariela Tubert and Justin Tiehen argue that’s impossible …
Shownotes
Technologist’s are racing to create AGI, artificial general intelligence. They also say we must align the AGI’s moral values with our own. But Professors Ariela Tubert and Justin Tiehen argue that’s impossible. Once you create an AGI, they say, you also give them the intellectual capacity needed for freedom, including the freedom to reject your given values. Originally aired in season 2.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsCould AI Have Moral Worth?
My guest today, Josh Gellers, Dean at the University of North Florida, argues that AI has more awards. More specifically, he thinks that AI has been used to create new biological organisms that meet the …
Shownotes
My guest today, Josh Gellers, Dean at the University of North Florida, argues that AI has more awards. More specifically, he thinks that AI has been used to create new biological organisms that meet the criteria for moral worth. Does that mean that AI itself has moral worth? Should we think that if something is not natural it lacks moral worth? All this and more in today’s episode
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsDon’t Believe the Hype About AI Job Displacement
My guests today - Professor Kate Vredenburgh and VR specialist Lauren Wong - argue that there are at least two strong reasons for calming down: first, AI isn’t good enough to replace us at our jobs. Second …
Shownotes
My guests today - Professor Kate Vredenburgh and VR specialist Lauren Wong - argue that there are at least two strong reasons for calming down: first, AI isn’t good enough to replace us at our jobs. Second, even if they were, it’s up to us to develop AI in a way that supports rather than replaces us. We also talk about whether AI adoption is suffering for the same reasons the metaverse was never successful: we’re failing to appreciate how to get people to justifiably buy in to the technology.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsDoes Social Media Diminish Our Autonomy?
Are we dependent on social media in a way that erodes our autonomy? After all, platforms are designed to keep us hooked and to come back for more. And we don’t really know the law of the digital lands, since …
Shownotes
Are we dependent on social media in a way that erodes our autonomy? After all, platforms are designed to keep us hooked and to come back for more. And we don’t really know the law of the digital lands, since how the algorithms influence how we relate to each other online in unknown ways. Then again, don’t we bear a certain degree of personal responsibility for how we conduct ourselves, online or otherwise? What the right balance is and how we can encourage or require greater autonomy is our topic of discussion today. Originally aired in season two.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsHow AI Robs Us of Meaning
Much of what we find fulfilling in life isn’t the having but the doing. It’s the process of working through a problem, taking action, doing what needs to be done. But that meaning may be on the verge of being …
Shownotes
Much of what we find fulfilling in life isn’t the having but the doing. It’s the process of working through a problem, taking action, doing what needs to be done. But that meaning may be on the verge of being greatly diminished; so contends my guest, Sven Nyholm, Professor of Ethics of AI at lMU MUNICH. I push back in various ways: how real and/or imminent is this threat, really? And who is responsible for staving it off?
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsShould Anthropic Have Allowed Autonomous Weapons Systems?
Anthropic just got the axe from the U.S. government for refusing to allow the Department of Defense (War?) to use Claude for autonomous weapons systems and mass surveillance. For the first 15 minutes of this …
Shownotes
Anthropic just got the axe from the U.S. government for refusing to allow the Department of Defense (War?) to use Claude for autonomous weapons systems and mass surveillance. For the first 15 minutes of this conversation with Michael Horowitz - professor at UPenn, Senior Fellow for Technology and Innovation at the Council on Foreign Relations, and formerly Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Force Development and Emerging Capabilities and Director of the Emerging Capabilities Policy Office at the DoD - we talk explicitly about Anthropic vs. the U.S. government. Why Anthropic did it, why this is more about personality than policy, and more. In the remaining 45 minutes you’ll hear a replay of an episode Michael and I did back in October, in which Michael defends the functional and ethical importance of potentially using AI for autonomous weapons systems.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsHow an Attorney Leads Responsible AI Practices
What does it look like for a non-technologist to lead Responsible AI practices at a Fortune 500 company? Today I talk with James Desir, Senior corporate counsel at Progressive Insurance and a key leader in …
Shownotes
What does it look like for a non-technologist to lead Responsible AI practices at a Fortune 500 company? Today I talk with James Desir, Senior corporate counsel at Progressive Insurance and a key leader in their RAI efforts. We discuss how he found his way into this space, how he persuades data scientists to treat him as a thought partner instead of a blocker, and how to demonstrate the ROI of RAI to fellow executives. We also talk about the increasing complexity of AI and how a small RAI team can handle the scale of the problem.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Hier stehen die neuesten 40 von 106 Folgen. Ältere Folgen findest du im Feed des Podcasts.
Ähnliche Podcasts
Mehr Bildung-Podcasts
Ist das dein Podcast?
Bestätige es mit einem Eintrag in deinem Feed: Du bekommst hier einen Code, trägst ihn als podcast:txt in den Kanal deines Feeds ein, und wir prüfen ihn. Danach steht dein Podcast als „verifiziert“ bei SoundNode.