Skip to content

Stop Gambling With Generic AI

November 3, 2025 · 36 min

Show notes

Send us Fan Mail

We challenge the false confidence of generic jury data and show how venue-specific psychographics, behavioral science, and calibrated AI deliver sharper voir dire, stronger narratives, and better outcomes for plaintiffs. We also unpack confirmation bias, defensive attribution, and hindsight bias with practical ways to neutralize them.

• the danger of national averages and convenience samples
• how local culture and venue history shape damages attitudes
• why demographics mislead and psychographics predict
• confirmation bias, victim blaming and hindsight bias explained
• building targeted SJQs that bypass social desirability
• engineering voir dire to expose latent predispositions
• tailoring themes to venue-specific belief patterns
• using simulations to pressure test openings and experts
• examples of predicted triggers driving deliberations
• ethical guardrails and maintaining human oversight



https://scienceofjustice.com/

@JuryAnalyst

All episodes of Science of Justice

Settings

Display

Language

Decides which stations you see first on the home page.

History

Recently played stations and episodes and your latest searches are only stored in this browser.

Notifications

A short notice when a podcast you follow has a new episode. Turn off single podcasts with the bell on their page.

Account

Save favorites – in the app and on the website.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Open search
Space
Play or pause
← →
In the player: back 15 s, forward 30 s (episodes) · in a row: next tile
↑ ↓
In a row: target within the tile
Home / End
In a row: first or last tile
Esc
Close window or menu
?
This overview
Now playing

Go to station page

Play next

    Add episodes with “Play next” – they play after the current episode.